I speak about Paris

ELEMENTARY WATSON

This is not an ethical problem, it is simply a problem of a lack of studies and reasoning from Dr Watson, absence of coherence and cohesion in his analysis, and ignorance of what is that ´thing´ called ´caring thinking´.

Perhaps the question would be here: which is the methodology by means of which the results that Dr Watson presented were obtained? Second, is Dr. Watson telling the truth? Really, the problem is not the results but the manner in which they were produced and also not what is said but who says it.

I have no fear nor do I have any reservation in saying that Dr Watson is, simply, ignorant. In effect, a Nobel Prize winner can be terribly ignorant.

Dr Watson, very well known, over 20 years ago, as a racist, is ignorant about the epistemology, disdainful about the ethics, and crudely boring.

In addition, Dr Watson is ugly, horrible, and he was horrible also when he was a young man. This is not an argument, nor tries to be it, simply, it is nice to say to the truth and it is ugly to look at the ugly Dr Watson. Elementary, Sherlock... Before the declarations of this human who does not read the sufficient in the areas that do not know, the best thing is to laugh. In extreme and stupid situations, to laugh is healthy.

Labels: racism, watson

0 comments